| Regulatory boundary previously focused on US covered-motor framing. | EU-bound projects could misread LVD/EMC applicability and delay compliance planning. | Added cross-market compliance triage facts (DOE Subpart B/X/Z, EU LVD voltage thresholds, EMC directive obligations). | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Voltage-sensitivity row had a data inconsistency at 6V no-load current. | Users could understate current needs in battery-edge conditions. | Corrected 6V no-load current from 0.12 A to 0.15 A using the vendor technical specs page. | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Ratio/power/current tradeoff lacked operating-point boundaries. | Teams could over-index on max-power rows and miss higher current/heat burden. | Added max-efficiency vs max-power operating-point rows and explicit continuous/instantaneous load guardrails. | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Gear architecture comparison relied too much on narrative text. | Spur/worm/hypoid decisions can become anecdotal without explicit efficiency ranges. | Added manufacturer-published transmission efficiency and ratio-range references in a dedicated evidence table. | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Power-cost section had no latest monthly marker. | Readers could miss that near-term tariff movement changes annualized OPEX context. | Added month-by-month Jan-Mar 2026 industrial tariff rows plus preliminary-estimate status from EIA technical notes. | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Current-risk recovery path was mostly 12V-internal. | Projects near driver-current limits lacked a clear electrical-architecture fallback option. | Added catalog-backed 24V sibling-path counterexample (same performance class with about half current draw) and explicit applicability limits. | Closed (updated 2026-05-23) |
| Cross-vendor lead-time benchmark still unresolved. | Public lead-time claims can be mistaken for normalized market truth. | Kept the uncertainty explicit: no reliable open normalized lead-time dataset is currently available. | Open (public dataset gap remains) |
| 36 rpm reversible alias previously lacked direct public model evidence. | The page could answer routing intent but still look generic to users comparing a real 36 rpm listing. | Added a direct 36RPM 12VDC reversible public-spec snapshot with voltage, current, torque, shaft, ratio, and efficiency fields. | Closed (updated 2026-06-11) |
| Reversible operation was described as an RFQ field, not a mechanical/electrical boundary. | Users could assume polarity reversal is enough even when the driver, brushes, gearbox backlash, or stop-before-reverse behavior is the real risk. | Added reverse-duty constraints from DC gearmotor manuals and brushed DC motor guidance: polarity reversal, rated-current limiting, brush/commutator wear, and driver sizing. | Closed (updated 2026-06-11) |
| 36 rpm speed matching lacked ratio math and tolerance interpretation. | A buyer could overfit to exactly 36 rpm and reject viable 34-37 rpm catalog alternatives before load testing. | Added a ratio-to-speed bridge showing that 12V catalogs publish nearby 34 rpm, 36 rpm, and 37 rpm rows across different gear families and frames. | Closed (updated 2026-06-11) |
| OpenSpec closure needed to remain auditable after alias merge. | Reviewers could see canonical content updates but miss whether the no-dedicated-route decision was formally closed. | Archived change 2026-06-11-add-kw-12v-dc-reversible-gearhead-motors-36-rpm-page with completed alias-merge tasks and synced rwa-pages requirement. | Closed (archived 2026-06-11) |
| 55rpm reversible alias previously had no direct answer on the canonical page. | Users comparing a real 55RPM 12VDC reversible gearhead motor could assume a separate route was missing. | Added 55 rpm preset support plus direct public-spec rows covering loaded-speed, no-load speed, current, torque, ratio, and speed-tolerance ambiguity. | Closed (updated 2026-06-16) |
| 55 rpm speed claims can describe different load points across vendors. | A buyer could compare a 55RPM loaded-speed listing against a 55 rpm no-load datasheet row and make the wrong current or torque decision. | Added a load-point interpretation table that separates loaded, no-load, rated, and max-efficiency speed before supplier commitment. | Closed (updated 2026-06-16) |
| Reversal frequency was not tied to a formal motor duty-cycle language. | A supplier could answer "reversible" but still omit whether the motor is rated for continuous operation, intermittent starts, electric braking, or variable-load cycles. | Added IEC 60034-1:2026 publication boundary plus an S-duty RFQ translation table so 36 rpm and 55 rpm reversible projects can request cycle evidence instead of only rpm/current rows. | Closed (updated 2026-06-16) |